Imagine two engineering teams with the same size, the same roles, and the same AI budget. A year later, one has cut delivery time nearly in half; the other has a very impressive token dashboard. Most enterprise budgets would fund them identically next year, because technology budgeting is built around access and fairness. That model works for software licenses and breaks down with AI, because AI is productive capacity, not a tool employees consume. Give everyone baseline access, then manage the rest like an investment portfolio: measure outcomes at the team level and move capacity toward the teams that turn it into revenue.
Economics3 articles
There is a planning meeting most executives have never sat in: the constraint on next year's roadmap is not hiring, and the only question is how much speed leadership wants to fund. Growth has always been throttled by headcount, and AI maturity decides when that stops. As organizations climb the maturity curve, execution capacity decouples from headcount, the limiting factor shifts from talent to investment, and AI spending becomes a CEO-level growth dial that changes how companies scale.
In Douglas Adams' The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, a crashed ship of useless middle-managers declares leaves to be legal tender, gets immensely rich, and then has to burn down the forests to fight the inflation that follows. It is a joke, and it is also exactly how money works. Plant too many trees through quantitative easing and stimulus, and eventually you have to burn some by hiking rates to keep the remaining currency meaningful.


